Exchange of E-mail between Mansur Ali Khan and Anjum Niaz

All Dated July 24, 2011

MANSUR ALI KHAN’s E-MAIL TO ANJIM NIAZ

TO: Ms Anjum Niaz

E-mail: anjumniaz@rocketmail.com

FM: Mansur Ali Khan
Toronto, Canada

E-mail: mansur.ak.ca@gmail.com

RE: Rajiv Gandhi in Swiss Deal

Just that you are a columnist who often writes drivels, just does not make you the truth teller.

First thing: Rajiv never stole anything, He did not and has no Swiss bank account. This is the fancy storytelling classic of former newspaper editor Aroun Shourie and the Gang at BJP who make their life mantra: Hate + Destroy Gandhi Family.

The Bofors commission was split between some of the promoting agents that would be legitimate anywhere in this world but India that does not recognize or reward business agents, for some peculiar reason of its own. Which breeds more corruption only.

Second, Zardari and the Sharifs also do not have Swiss accounts. If they stole any money, it is not there.

You think defenseless Zardari or Sarifs would be harmless targets, unable to hit back at your snides, huh pal? Clever, but unethical.

And — for a change — why not go after the Generals (the real robbers) who have been bleeding Pak to death by their monetary and political shenanigans for ages. Let us see some of your bravado there.

Anjum’s Reply:

Anjum Niaz to me
show details Jul 24 (2 days ago)

Obviously you’ve taken the Rajiv Gandhi Swiss accusation personally!

You live in Canada and are unaware of the corruption being done right now by Rajiv’s wife and children. I have first hand information from credible Indians who have come to Pakistan recently. So for you to fling your scorn at me by calling it “drivel” is most unfair.

Second: Obviously this is the first time you’ve read me otherwise you would NEVER accuse me of cowardice. I am perhaps one of the very few who has the guts to point out the corruption being done by generals.

So, may I humbly suggest Sir, before throwing stones at someone, make sure you know everything about that person.

Anyway, I appreciate your caring to write to me and venting. You’re most welcome.

Best wishes
anjum niaz

PSF Lahore :
@Aamir Mughal Sir, Thank you for this correction. In that case, please read as “She IS a misfit in Dawn.’

Dear Brother,

If she is a misfit in dawn [Dawn group has many spineless persons and you would have to read them after 12 Oct 1999] now back to exposing Ms. Anjum Niaz.

Back in 2007 in the Daily Dawn she had written:

“QUOTE”
At my age it’s not appropriate to compromise with the military and seek a PPP ticket for the 2008 elections. But my loyalty to the PPP will remain grounded. It’s my national duty he tells me when I ask him whether he would like to serve BB again. Benazir showed respect when addressing her interior minister. She and the General Sahib liked to engage in intellectual dialogue. Unlike other cabinet ministers, I never saw Babar cringe before his young prime minister. He was in the centre of investigations when Benazirs two brothers were killed. I went to South of France when Shahnawaz died in July 1985. I know exactly what happened and who killed him. Why, then, has he not revealed the identity of Shahnawaz’s killers? Because I was advised not to go beyond the drawn line, he says. The substance that killed Shahnawaz was used by very few countries. The FBI and the French authorities investigated independently but kept their findings secret because of certain international sensitivities. Whodunnit? By Anjum Niaz October 28, 2007 [Dawn Magazine]

“UNQUOTE”

Now in 2010 she writes in the same Dawn Magazine.

“QUOTE”
But one sad incident clearly stays in his memory of those bucolic days; the untimely death of Shahnawaz Bhutto. Marker sketches the details of the tragedy as though it happened yesterday. Begum Nusrat Bhutto lived in Cannes, in the French Riviera. The lodgings were loaned to her by the then French minister of justice. The minister was a good friend of the Bhuttos as was President Gaddafi of Libya. Gaddafi had given large sums of money to the Bhuttos. One evening during dinner in a restaurant, the two boys — Murtaza and Shahnawaz — entered into an argument over the division of the money. “Benazir tried to calm them down but she didn’t succeed,” remembers Marker. In the end she took her mother and sister back to their home, while Murtaza followed Shahnawaz to his flat. The fight turned ugly. At some point the French police came to arrest the inmates. By that time Shahnawaz was unconscious. He had taken an overdose of drugs. The police could not arrest Murtaza because he had a Syrian diplomatic passport. Later that night the younger brother passed away. The police arrested his Afghan wife for “not coming to the aid of a dying man.” She hired a lawyer but the case was quashed by the bereaved family when she threatened to spill the beans. “The whole affair was so sordid; so grim; so grisly,” says Marker who was given all the details by the head of the French intelligence police. But General Naseerullah Babar, who was later Benazir’s interior minister, claims that General Zia had a hand in the murder. He had sent a death squad to eliminate the younger son. Babar says Shahnawaz was poisoned, I ask Marker: “No, that’s not true at all. Zia had nothing to do with it.” No Spinzone: Interview with history By Anjum Niaz
Sunday, 07 Mar, 2010 http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/columnists/anjum-niaz-interview-with-history-730

“UNQUOTE”

Why these Journalists don’t investigate before opening their mouths.

PSF Lahore :
Annjum Niaz is a refined version of Ansar Abbasi and Shahid Masood. She was a misfit in Dawn. The News (Jang Group) is a ‘befitting abode’ for her.

She still contribute for Dawn. Read the images.

Our so called ‘Dignitaries’ are actually fond of such protocols in the name of ‘Threat’. They say that the ‘ threat ‘ is from a community who does not like USA or Pakistanis working for or favoring USA activities and policies. How shameful when our ‘Dignitories’ including all political parties, while in power, shut themselves up in their bunkers of concrete and suddenly cease interaction with the general public at large. Just a radioed, telephonic or video exhort is considered enough participation in the process of being a selected leader or leaders. On that same coward environment by our leaders Hilary Cinton, visited every place in Pakistan, even public gatherings to remove the doubts of a common Pakistani against USA. Her visit was may be not for the general public but rather for our leaders that if you want our support get out from your fears and bunkers. Even a small official of USA, like Anne Paterson visited SWAT, considered a centre of USA hatred (duly reported by our leaders to them). After their successful visits in general public, our leaders gathered some courage, came out from their holes and started facing the electing nation. If our political leadership is facing very very very real threat of life, they must then get out of this country and start communicating, managing and controlling the nation through telephone or video conferrencing like Altaf use to do. Their presence or absense means nothing to this nation rather their presence further hinders the general activities of the society when they make plans to move from one place to another making the whole system paralyzed in the name of ‘Threat to their lives’. How does the threat diminishes when they are not in power and they use their usual way of transport without security.

While in power, comes the protocol, let us allow our poor dignitaries and even their families or their familiar families associated with them some how, to enjoy the protocol on our expense. The protocol is their constitutional right and thats why when that right is being snatched from them then ‘Respected Dignitaries’ or ‘Untouchables’ are beaten on roads like Tariq Azeem or Sher Afgan, etc. No body should be allowed to comment on them as the commentator will be hanged, will be termed a yellow, red or white, or anti Pakistani. Wow.

The quoted plaragraph 1 is a readers view and you need to produce evidence from her own writings to prove your point.