In praise of Hazrat Yazid ibn Muawiya
Related post: مفتی تقی عثمانی نے دیوبندی مکتب فکر کو ناصبیوں اور تکفیریوں کےہاتھ فروخت کر دیا
The following are a few examples of some prominent Salafi (Ahl-e-Hadith or Wahhabi) and Deobandi scholars of Saudi Arabia, India and Pakistan who claim themselves to be Sunni Muslims (Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat) and treat Yazid ibn Muawiyah as a legitimate Caliph and Hazrat Imam Hussain as a rebel or treat the tragedy of Karbla as a battle between two princes (of the Umayyad and Hashemite clans).
Darul Uloom Deobandi’s fatwa in support of Yazid
Darul Uloom Deoband’s fatwa in support of Hazrat Yazid – by Abdur Rahim Kandhalvi
http://darulifta-deoband.org/showuserview.do?function=answerView&all=en&id=6134
Grand Mufti Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah bin Baz of Saudi Arabia praises Yazeed (R.A.)
Yazeed bin Muaviyah Kaun? – by Sheikh Maqsood-ul-Hassan Faizi (Salafi-Wahhabi)
Sponsored by Dr. Zakir Naik’s Islamic Research Centre (IRC)
and Islamic Dawa and Guidance Centre, Al Ghat, Saudi Arabia
Dr. Zakir Naik (Salafi-Deobandi) praises Yazeed
A video of Dr Zakir Naik saying “May Allah be pleased with him” for Yazid and calling Karbala a political war.
Dr. Zakir Naik defends his praise of Yazid
Dr. Zakir Naik’s further clarification about Yazid
10th Muharram is an Eid day, Muharram is a month of happiness. A student of Zakir Naik’s IRC claims:
Dr Israr Ahmed (Salafi-Deobandi) of Pakistan exonerates Yazid from Imam Hussain’s murder
Javed Ahmed Ghamidi exonerates Yazid
Despite his non-Takfeeri approach to Shias and Sufis/Barelvis (something which distinguishes him from Takfir Salafists and Takfiri Deobandis, e.g. Ihsan Elahi Zaheer, Manzoor Nomani, Haq Nawaz Jhangvi etc), Javed Ghamidi generally negates almost all traditions in which Ahl-e-Bait (family) of the Prophet have been praised. His views on the great sacrifice of Imam Hussain in Karbala are completely in line with those of Zakir Naik, Israr Ahmed, Abdul Aziz bin Baz, Ibn Taymiyyah etc, although he is not as transparent. He considers Imam Hussain as a leader of an illegitimate rebellion and exonerates Yazid from the murder of Imam Hussain and other members of the Prophet’s family. He blames Ibn Ziyad for Hussain’s murder and terms the entire incident as an ‘afsosnak hadsa’ “a regrettable accident”. This apolitical, acontextual assessment of Karbala is in stark contrast with analyses of Karbala by other Sunni and Shia scholars who support Imam Hussain’s just opposition (Qayam) to Yazid’s illegitimate rule.
Ghamidi claims that: “Imam Hussain had reviewed his decision of opposition to Yazid; he wanted to move away from Karbala and even wanted to go to Yazid but Ibn Ziyad’s army did not allow that”.
Ghamidi rationalizes Muawiya’s mutiny (baghawat) against a legitimate ruler (Hazrat Ali, the Khalifa-e-Rashid). He presents false neutrality between Hazrat Ali and Muaviya and exonerates Muaviah under the cover of Ijtihadi Ghalti (an error of judgement) and lack of information. Of course, he will not use similar logic to exonerate Abu Jehl or Abu Lahb.
Sunni (Salafi-Deobandi) followers of Yazid
Alternative Sunni perspective
Majority of Sunni Muslims, including Hanafis (Barelvi, Deobandi) and Salafis (Ahl-e-Hadith), treat Yazid and his father as a deviation from the Khilafat-e-Rashida (Rashidun Caliphs), and support Imam Hussain’s stance against Yazid and Hazrat Ali’s stance against Muawiya. They consider all those who either exonerate or justify actions of Yazid and his father against Hazrat Ali, Imam Hassan and Imam Hussain as Nasibis, i.e., enemies of the Ahl-e-Bait (family) and descendants (Aal) of the Prophet Muhammad.
Here are a few examples:
Maulana Muhammad Ishaq’s (a Salafi scholar) views:
Moulana Tariq Jameel’s (Tablighi, Deobandi scholar) views
Dr. Tahir ul Qadri’s (Sunni, Hanafi, Barelvi) views
Pir Alaudin Siddiqui’s (Sunni Barelvi scholar) views
Muhaddith Zubair Ali Zai’s views (Ahl-e-Hadith, Salafi)
Maulana Tauseef-ur-Rehman’s (Salafi) views
http://youtu.be/zPhjrNGond4
Maulana Syed Abul Aala Maududi’s (Sunni, Deobandi, founder of Jamaat-e-Islami) views
http://www.ziyaraat.net/books/Khilafat_o_Malookiat.pdf
Pir Syed Irfan Shah’s (Sunni Barelvi scholar) views
http://youtu.be/hMIalxpQyHA
Final message for Sunni-Salafi-Shia unity by Maulana Muhammad Ishaq (Ahl-e-Hadith)
Followers of Yazid and Takfiri terrorism
یہ کونسا مذہب ہے جو نفرت کی تعلیم دیتا ہے، یہ کونسا مذہب ہے جسکی بنیاد گالیاں دینا اور لعن طن کرنا ہے۔ اسلام تو محبت کا دین ہے اور یزید ابن معاویہ مسلمانوں کے ایک حکمران تھے، اس حکمران سے اختلاف رائے کا حق ہر کسی کو ہے لیکن گالیاں دینا، لعن طعن کرنا اور نفرت پھیلانا کونسا مذہب ہے۔
@Kashif Naseer
[Lahab 111:1] May both the hands of Abu Lahab be destroyed – and they are destroyed!
[Lahab 111:2] His wealth did not benefit him in the least, nor did whatever he earned.
[Lahab 111:3] He will soon enter the flaming fire.
[Lahab 111:4] And so will his wife; carrying a bundle of firewood on her head.
[Lahab 111:5] A rope made from palm fibre around her neck!
Allah’s lanat (curse) be upon Zalimeen and their supporters and also on the Nasibis (enemies of Ahl-e-Bait) and their apologists.
This man Abu Lahab was one of the uncles of the Messenger of Allah. His name was Abdul-Uzza bin Abdul-Muttalib. His surname was Abu Utaybah and he was only called Abu Lahab because of the brightness of his face. He used to often cause harm to the Messenger of Allah. He hated and scorned him and his religion.
It has been mentioned from Ibn Masud that when the Messenger of Allah called his people to faith, Abu Lahab said,
“Even if what my nephew says is true, I will ransom myself (i.e., save myself) from the painful torment on the Day of Judgement with my wealth and my children.”
opposer of truth you should write instead of truth . In surah almasad, Abulehab was the topic dont mix with it to those whom you hate. Most worse you given the example as you. Never use Quran’s as a wrong logic that you gave here.
I agree with Saudi Grand Mufti Abdullah bin Baz and Dr. Zair Nai. May Allah be pleased with Yazid and Muawiya.
تم ابو لہب جس نے رسول خدا کواذیت پنہچائی اس کی مذمت کرتے ہو لیکن معاویہ جس نے امام حسن کو زہر دیا اور یزید جس نے امام حسین اور اہلبیت کے درجنوں افراد، رسول الله کی اولاد کو قتل کیا اس پر لعنت کرنے سے گریز کرتے ھو، تم پر الله اور اس کے رسول کی لعنت تا قیامت انشا الله
ye to shia kafiron ko tareekh hy jo k 90% sy zyada tehreef shuda or ghalat hy. Agar Yazeed ny Hazrat Hassan R.a ko zehar dia tha to sabit kro, agar Hazrat Hussain R.a ko yazeed ny shaheed kia tha to b sabit kro. yad rakho history is my buhat sy ikhtilaf rakhti hy. phir my kun bila tasdeek k kisi ko bura kahun. Agar jis kisi ny Hazrat Hassan R.a ya Hussain Ra ko shaheed kia hy to wo jahnumi hy, Khuah koi b ho. Allah ki us pr lanat hy.
Rahi bat shia kafiron ki , to un k kam hi fisaad phelana hy.
Ashabe Muhammad SAWW zindabad
Muhammad
Hey Muawiyah……Just think about few questions. How do u feel deep in your heart when people call you with name Muawiyah?. Have you ever think how many millions have the name Muawiyah in all Muslim population and how many have the name Ali. Just think about that. Do you know something about Maulana Maudoodi (RA)…..He was a sunni scholar…read his book “Khilafat o Malookiat”…He wrote this book based on Sunni history and then you can find who was Muawiyah and who was Ali. Have you ever read any Islamic history written by a western scholoar? You may better find Muawiyah and Yazeed characters….Whenever you will do some research on history you will always explore these two characters….and you will never feel better in your heart.
maira naam Muawia ni hy Lubp waly lantion ny khud sy likha hy. lekin jo Ghalat batain tum log un k bary main kehty ho or smajty ho wo ghalat hain. wo 1 sachy sahabiy Rasool SAWW thy. un ki Hazrat Ali R.a say bhi koi larai or dushmani ni. Main Mulana Mododi k pairokar ni hun or na hi wo maira rehbar hy. Lehaza mujy is ki daleel na do. unhon ny jo b kaha mujhy is k ilm ni. Rahi bat Hazrat Ali R.a or Hazrat Muawia R.a ki to un ki apis main koi dushmani ni thi . Lehaza Muawia naam rakhna ya Ali naam rakhny main koi harj ni hy. Main ye bardasht ni karsakta k koi Sahabi R.a ko bura kahy. Lehaza apni soch apny tak rakho.
Ashabe Muhammad SAWW zindabad. Hazrat Yazid, Muawiya, Abu Sufian zindabad.
Hay Muawiyah
You can not change the reality by closing your eyes. You can not change the history. Its not the shia history, just go to any historian, any historical reference (sunni, saudi etc.) this is fact that Muawiyah fought with Ali. Now you will say it was “galat fehmi”. It was not any galat fehmi. No body in the world (any educated person sunni, wahabi etc.) can deny that Muawiyah killed Muhammad ibne Abu Bakar. No body can deny that Muawiyah started “lanat” on Ali ibne Abi Talib from the official members which continued until Hazrat Umar bin Abdul Aziz era.
Hay Muawiya, you can not change the facts. You can only deny the facts. Do you feel happy inside by following Yazid? Hussain and Yazid represent two entire different school of thoughts. Do you feel happy inside by favoring Yazid on Hussain? Hussain is a symbol of virtue all over the world and Yazid is symbol of evil all over the world. History always show off.
Can anybody deny in Pakistan now that ISI didn’t make IJI in 1990 elections. I do not support one political party over the other, but I can not deny that there was no involvement of IJI in 1990 elections. History tells me about this. History tells you Hajaj ibne Yousuf killed so many Sahabas. History tells you that Al-walid (Sahabi and governer of Kufa)lead the prayer when he was drunk and was beaten by lashes (koray) in era of third caliph. You don’t want to listen that any Sahabi was drunk while leading the prayer. You can not remove many incidents like these from your own history and Ahadees books.
Muawiyah, you have to remain in state of denial, but in my opinion, you can never change the historical facts.
Idk whats the use of telling each other that he is right or wrong.
We all know that Karbala happened a very long time ago. No muslim (Shia / Sunni) pays less respect to Hazrat Ali (R.A.T.A.) or Hazrat Imam Hussain (R.A.T.A.) or Ahl-e-Bayt.
We all agree that Hazrat Imam Hussain (R.A.T.A) should not be martyred by anyone in this whole world and the killer and the person who gave such orders will definitely be sent to hell by Allah.
Instead of pin pointing names, we can still curse the killers and we know that our cursing cannot force Allah Taala to punish the killer if HE don’t want to. We also know that If we think some one is wrong and we curse him with Allah’s Lanat, its only Allah who decides who deserves his lanat, like Abu Lahab. So stop cursing each other please.
Its been ages since Shia / Sunni is fighting endlessly on a matter which was beyond their control. This need to be seriously considered by common Shia / Sunni so that he/she can contribute to stop ever-growing hatred between two communities. We are already facing difficult times in Pakistan and spreading hatred will only increase it.
I am fed up of this fight as it seems never ending. I condemn killing of all humans (Shia / sunni / hazara / all) and cruel animal hunting activities. The above comments are posted in good faith. Still you want to curse me, please proceed, as I am clear about the concept of right/wrong cursing. Unless Allah wants a loss for me, no one can make it happen.
sab sy pehly us par Allah ki lanat lanat ho jo Sahabiye Rasool SAWW ko bura kahy . Tarmazi shareef ki hadees e Nabwi SAWW hy k Jab tum main sy koi mairy sahaba (R.a) ko bura kahy to us par lanat bhaijo.
Rahi bat Hazrat Muawiya R.a ki to main ab b apny muakkif p kaim hun or rahun ga k Hazrat Ali R.a or Hazrat Muawiya R.a ki apis may zati koi dushmani ni thi han wo larai ghalat fehmi ki bunyad pr hoi thi , jis main Hazrat Ameer Muawiya R.a kisaase Hazrat Usman R.a k haq main thy . Jo be tha bad main dono Ashab R.a k darmyab sulah ho gai thi. Yakeenan Hazrat Ali R.a haq pr thy. darjy k lihaz sy b Hazrat Ali R.a afzal hain Hazrat Ameer Muawiyah R.a sy . Ab is bat ko tum mazmon bana kar un ko bura ni keh sakty. Ye dono Ashabiy Rasool SAWW k mamla hy. tumhy har masly main parny ki zaroorat ni. Zubani baatain na kia kro daleel k sath sabit kro.
Baki jo tumhari history hy us main to Amma Aisha saddeka R.a , Hazrat Usman R.a, Hazrat Abubakar R.a , Hazrat Umar R.a ko b bura kaha gya hy. Yahan tak k un k Ashabiy Rasool SAWW k darjy sy b kharij kar diya. Main aisi history ko ni manta . Balky aisi shio ki fikhi kitaabon ko jala daina chahiy.
Ahle Bait R.a zindabad
Ashabe Muhammad SAWW zindabad.
Agar Lubp walon nay mairy comment main koi tabdeeli ki to ye daleel hogi k in sy bara ghaleez, munafik or faraibi koi ni.
Hey Muawyia….it doesn’t matter if you accept the history or not but history remains there. I already said, denial is different thing and fact is different thing. You didn’t reply to any of my question and wrote the same answer which I was expecting “galat fehmi”. You can see in my previous post I wrote that you will say “galat fehmi”. The events I wrote in my previous post are in Bukhari and Muslim sharifs. How many books you will burn to prove that “Muawyia” and “Yazid” were pious people. Kings of Banu Umayyah dynasty were not able to do this task. No body will ever be able to hide the “deeds” of these two characters. Anyway, keep it up.
I will never accept your shia history. They are greatest faasedeen. I will defend and I m defending Hazrat Muawiyah R.a, including all Sahabie Rasool SAWW and Zojae Rasool SAWW Ummahatul moe*mineen R.a. and Ahle Bait R.a.
You should stop your dirty tongue against any Sahabi or Ahle Bait. Other wise i will prove your shia relegion as a worst Kafir relegion ever, and no doubt I can. Alhamdulillah
Ashabe Muhammad SAWW zindabad.
Ahle bait R.a zindabad
Why all of our friends in here are creating more friction and further dividing Muslims of Pakistan. Can’t we live peacefully respecting each others tenets and beliefs. Pakistan is already burning and in furtherance we are fanning the flames. Who lives if Pakistan dies – Quaid-e-Azam.
I am a Sunnie because I was born in Sunnie family. But the education I received and the nurture by my parents have given me a notion : don’t leave your belief and respect others belief. Pakistan was quite a different land some fifteen years back – not quite a distant past. At least I didn’t hear about Takfiri Muslims and their extreme hatred towards Shiite brothers. Why now? This is something politically motivated insurgency. Through this forum I want to give a message to our Shiites brothers, we sunnies are not part of those Takrifi insurgents, or those Lashkar-e-Jhangivi, Hazbe-Tehreer or likes of them. 98% Sunnies think Shias as our brothers, they know our Shia brothers led from front in the Pakistan movement. Only a handful of insurgents pumped by foreign dollars and riyals are playing the bloody game, we disown them big time.
What ever you say , you can but I have pudency. I am ghayoor muslim and can’t bear any thing against Sahaba R.a and Ahle Bait R.a. May you don’t know the shia relegion kafir and barelivi mushrik. Only you are not 98%.
I do not understand why someone in this forum trying to convince others that history is distorted n that probably killers of Hazrat Imam Hussain are unknown. I m a Sunni n I being an ordinary Muslim know that there were enough ahadith already pointing to this incident right even before it occurred. History of kufa, Basra, Iraq are filled with so much detail about yazeed’s attrocious deeds, even non Muslim writers have written about that khabees, then how come some people are still ambiguous about him. He is jahanumi n nothing else. Don’t confuse people on this. His supporters will also soon join him in hell. Rest Shia people should also stop abusing sahab karam. They were companions of Rasool (saw) n it is clear from ahadith also that nobody should be pointing fingers to any sahabi as everyone is honorable n esteemed for us except that yazeed lanti is not a sahabi but jahanumi
Agreed with faisal ,
Sahab-a-Karam do respect , love each other .Hazrat Muawiyah (RA) was a good man , we respect him The battle between Hazrat Ali (RA ) And Hazrat Muawaiyh due to Munafiqs ( which create confusion / misunderstanding between them ) that why both agreed on SULAH ,
Now come to YAZED , he is lanti / munafiq / janhanumi etc Hazrat Muhammad (SWA) grandson , Ale-e-Bait shahed by his order ( we have many evidence for this ) , what he did to his other family members ? all we can found in books there is no if , else , every thing is crystal clear
We love Hazrat Ali (RA), Hazrat Fatima (RA) , Hazart Ayesha (RA) , Hazrat Abu Baker siddiq (RA), Hazrat Umer (RA), Hazrat Usman (RA), Hazat Iman Hasan (RA), Hazrat Imam Husain (RA), and so many other etc etc
We are muslim and we proud above mentioned personalities
Allah forgive me
Ashab e Muhmmad SAWW zindabad
History mai contradictions hain main ye ni keh raha k Yazid k koi kasoor tha. Lekin ye zaroor kahon ga k Yazeed k kasoor sabit history ni kar sakti. jab k kasoor to unka b hy (Koofion) jinhon ny 1 khaas sazish k tehat Hazrat Hussain R.a ko khat likh kar wahan bulaya. Unhon ny kun bulaya is ko bhi smajny ki zaroorat hy. sirf 1 pehlo na daikha krain.
Mairy comment main lubp waly tabdeeli kun krta hy?
Yazid (May Allah give him what he deserves, and May Allah be pleased with his Father Ameer Mua’wiya – Radhi Allahu Anhu)
It has been noticed that some people in their indirect or even direct hatred for Ahlul Bayt (Family of Prophet – Peace be upon him) try to cover the acts of Yazid and in this process they try to paint him into a great personality. With the Grace of Allah we shall see how this traitor to Islam (i.e. Yazid) got Imam Hussain (Radhi Allahu Anhu) martyred and how he ransacked Madina al-Munawwara and committed heinous crimes therein
Firstly we would like to present this beautiful sahih hadith of Prophet (Salallaho alaihi wasalam) regarding people who “Ransack” our beloved sanctuary called Madina al Munawara.
Imam Ahmed narrates this report from Sa’ib bin Khalad (RA) that the Prophet of Allah (Peace be upon him) said: Whosoever spreads injustice and frightened the people of Madina, then Curse (Lanah) of Allah, his Angels and all the people is upon such a person. [Musnad Ahmed bin Hanbal as narrated by Imam Ibn Kathir in Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah Vol 8 Page No. 274]
Quran states: Those who annoy Allah and His Messenger, Allah has cursed them in this World and in the Hereafter and has prepared for them a humiliating Punishment (33:57)
What could be a bigger annoyance to the Prophet than getting his grandson brutally martyred and ransacking the place which he had declared as Harram (i.e. Sacred)
1. The heinous crimes of Yazid
Imam Ibn Kathir (rah) says in his magnificent work of Tarikh under events of 63 AH
فقال ابن الزبير يا هؤلاء قتل أصحابكم فانا لله وإنا إليه راجعون
وقد أخطأ يزيد خطأ فاحشا فى قوله لمسلم بن عقبة أن يبيح المدينة ثلاثة أيام وهذا خطأ كبير فاحش مع ما انضم إلى ذلك من قتل خلق من الصحابة وأبنائهم وقد تقدم أنه قتل الحسين وأصحابه على يدى عبيد الله بن زياد وقد وقع فى هذه الثلاثة أيام من المفاسد العظيمة فى المدينة النبوية مالا يحد ولا يوصف مما لا يعلمه إلا الله عز وجل وقد أراد بارسال مسلم بن عقبة توطيد سلطانه وملكه ودوام أيامه من غير منازع فعاقبه الله بنقيض قصده وحال بينه وبين ما يشتهيه فقصمه الله قاصم الجبابرة وأخذه أخذ عزيز مقتدر وكذلك أخذ ربك إذا أخذ القرى وهى ظالمة إن أخذه أليم شديد
Translation: Ibn Zubayr (Radhi Allaho Anho) said: O PEOPLE YOUR COMPANIONS HAVE BEEN KILLED – Inna Lillahi Wa Inna Ilaihi Rajiun
“Yazeed committed a mistake and that too a disgusting one by ordering Muslim bin Uqba to make Madina “mubah” for three days. This was his biggest and ugliest blunder. Many Sahaba and their children were slaughtered. As it has been mentioned before that Yazid made UbaydUllah Ibn Ziyad kill the grandson of Rasulullah (saw) Husayn and his companions, and in those three days huge heinous crimes happened in Madina about which nobody knows except Allah. Yazeed wanted to secure his governance by sending Muslim bin Uqbah but Allah did against his wishes and punished him. Verily Allah killed him likewise Allah made grip over the oppressing towns, no doubt His grip is painful and strict”.[Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Vol 8 Page 283]
2. Even Ibn Ziyad got outraged by Yazid
Yazid’s crimes were so heinous that even his loyal UbaidUllah Ibn Ziyad (whom he had sent to murder Muslim bin Aqeel and later Imam Hussain ra too) said:
كان يزيد كتب إلى عبد الله بن زياد أن يسير إلى الزبير فيحاصره بمكة فأبى عليه وقال والله لا أجمعهما للفاسق أبدا أقتل ابن بنت رسول الله ص وأغزو البيت الحرام وقد كانت أمه مرجانة قالت له حين قتل الحسين ويحك ماذا صنعت وماذا ركبت وعنفته تعنيفا شديدا قالوا وقد بلغ يزيد أن ابن الزبير يقول فى خطبته يزيد القرود شارب الخمور تارك الصلوات منعكف على القينات
Translation: When Yazid wrote to Ibn Ziyad that he should go to Makkah and besiege Abdullah Ibn Zubayr (RA) he refused to do so and said: By Allah I will not combine two things for a Fasiq (i.e. Yazid). I have already killed the son of Prophet (salallaho alaihi wasalam)’s daughter (on his order) and now (he asks me to) wage war on Bayt ul Harram? However when he martyred Imam Hussain (RA) his mother Marjana said to him: May you die! what have you done and what crime have you committed, she also scolded him severely. Yazid was informed that Abdullah Ibn Zubayr (RA) used to say in his speeches that Yazid was a fraud, drunkard, one who abandons Salaat and one who stays with singing women. [Al-Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Volume 8, Page No 279]
Imam Ibn Kathir (rah) further narrates:
ثم أباح مسلم بن عقبة الذى يقول فيه السلف مسرف بن عقبة قبحه الله من شيخ سوء ما أجهله المدينة ثلاثة أيام كما أمره يزيد لا جزاه الله خيرا وقتل خيرا خلقا من أشرافها وقرائها وانتهب أموالا كثيرة منها ووقع شر وفساد عريض على ما ذكره غير واحد فكان ممن قتل بين يديه صبرا معقل بن سنان وقد كان صديقه قبل ذلك ولكن أسمعه فى يزيد كلاما غليظا فنقم عليه بسببه
Translation: And he Muslim bin Uqba who is known as As-Salf Musraf bin Uqba, May Allah not do well to this leader of evil and ignorance, he made Madina legal for 3 days on the order of Yazid. May Allah also not grant Jaza and khayr to him(i.e. Yazid), he got many righteous killed and also looted the amwaal in Madina in great numbers, this has been multiply narrated that he created a lot of Shar and Fasad. It is mentioned that Hadrat Muafl bin Sanan (RA) was tied infront (of Ibn Uqba) and then martyred, you were his friend before but later you used strong words against Yazid due to which he became angry at you. [Al-Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Volume 8, Page No 280]
3. Yazeed’s aggression against the leading Tabi’i called Sa’eed Ibn Musaib (rah)
قال المدائنى وجىء إلى مسلم بسعيد بن المسيب فقال له بايع فقال أبايع على سيرة أبى بكر وعمر فأمر بضرب عنقه فشهد رجل إنه مجنون فخلى سبيله
Translation: Al Mudaini (rah) said: Sa’eed Ibn Musaib (rah) was brought to Muslim (bin uqba), He asked him to give bayah. (Sa’eed ibn Musab) said: I will give bayah on seerah of Sayyidna Abu Bakr and Sayyidna Umar (RA). (Muslim) ordered to get him killed but a man said This person (i.e. Sa’eed ibn Musaib) is a mad man (in order to save him), at this he was left alone. [Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Volume 8, Page No 281]
4. Shaykh ul Islam Ibn Hajr al-Asqalani (rah)
Imam Ibn Hajr (rah) made the whole title in his book al-Imta bil al-Arb’ain as “SENDING LANAH ON YAZID (لعن يزيد)”
وأما المحبة فيه والرفع من شأنه فلا تقع إلا من مبتدع فاسد الاعتقاد فإنه كان فيه من الصفات ما يقتضي سلب الإيمان عمن يحبه لأن الحب في الله والبغض في الله من الإيمان والله المستعان
Translation: Loving and glorifying him (Yazid) is not done “EXCEPT BY A HERETIC” who has void belief because he (Yazid) had such characteristics that his lover deserves to be faithless, because to love and hate just for the sake of God is a sign of faith. [Publisher's name: Dar ul Kutb al iLmiyyah, Beirut, Lebanon, Book name: al-Imta bil al-Arba'in al-Matbainatus Samah (الإمتاع بالأربعين المتباينة السماع), Author: Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani (rah), Publication date: 1997, Page No. 96]
قال يحيـى بن عبد الملك بن أبـي غنية أحد الثقات، ثنا نوفل بن أبـي عقرب ثقة قال: كنت عند عمر بن عبد العزيز فذكر رجل يزيد بن معاوية، فقال: قال أمير المؤمنين يزيد، فقال عمر: تقول أمير المؤمنين يزيد، وأمر به فضرب عشرين سوطاً
Yahya bin Abdul Mulk bin Abi Ghania “WHO WAS AMONGST THIQA NARRATORS” he heard from Nawfl bin Abi Aqrab “WHO IS THIQA” he narrates: Once in the gathering of Umar Bin Abdul Aziz [R.A] people talked about Yazid bin Muawiya, someone among the people mentioned Yazid with the title of Ameer ul Momineen, hearing this Hadrat Umar bin Abdul Aziz [ra] replied (in anger): You have called Yazeed Amir Ul Mominein? Then he gave order of 20 lashes to be given to the person [Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani in Tahdhib ut Tahdhib, Volume No. 6, Page No. 313].
5. Imam Jalal ud din Suyuti (rah) in Tarikh ul Khulafa
He states: You (Imam Hussain – Radhi Allaho Anho) were martyred and your head was brought to Ibn Ziyad on a plate. “May Allah’s Lanah (Curse) be upon the person who killed you, also Ibn Ziyad “AND UPON YAZID” [As-Suyuti in Tarikh ul Khulafa, Page No. 165]
Click here for Scanned Page (32)
Imam Jalal ud-din Suyuti (rah) writes: Nawfl bin Abi Firaat (rah) said that once he was sitting with Caliph Umar bin Abdul Aziz (rah) when a man called Yazid as “Ameer ul Momineen Yazid bin Muawiya” at this (Umar bin Abdul Aziz said in anger): you call this person as Ameer ul Momineen?! and then he ordered that person to be “lashed 20 times” in 63 AH Yazid got to know that people of Madina have rejected him and are preparing to wage war upon him, knowing this Yazid sent a huge army to Madina and “declared war upon people of Madina” after looting in Madina he sent the army to martyr Hadrat Abdullah bin Zubayr (ra) in Makkah and so the incident of “HURRA” took place, do you know what Hurra is? regarding it Hassan (a Tabi’i) said: When Madina was attacked, there remained not a single person who was safe from it, “huge amount of Sahaba and others were martyred and Madina was looted and thousands of virgin girls were raped” Inna Lillahi Wa Inna Ilaihi Rajiun… The Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: Whosoever frightens People of Madina then Allah will frighten them (the attackers) plus Curse (Lanah) of Allah, his Angels and all the people is upon such a person (Sahih Muslim) the reason why people of Madina did not give bayah to Yazid was because he was indulged in “too many sins” Imam Waqidi (rah) narrates from Abdullah Bin Khazlatal Ghusail (a Sahabi) that he said: By Allah we did not revolt against Yazid until we were sure that “WE WILL BE SHOWERED WITH STONES FROM SKY” (the Yazidans) started to do Nikah with their mothers, sisters and daughters, they started to drink openly and neglected prayers! Imam Dhahabi (rah) said: When Yazid did such things with people of Madina although “ he was indulged in drinking and other evil deeds even before” then the people of Makkah also revolted against him and rose against him from 4 sides and then Allah did not put Barakah in life of Yazid (Then it mentions that Yazid attacked Makkah and got the Abdullah Ibn Zubayr Martyred)
Reference: As-Suyuti, Tarikh ul Khulafa, Page No. 167
Click here for Scanned Page (33)
6. Allama Aloosi (Rahimuhullah) writes under 47:22-23 in his magnificent Ruh ul Ma’ani
واستدل بها أيضاً على جواز لعن يزيد عليه من الله تعالى ما يستحق. نقل البرزنجي في «الإشاعة» والهيتمي في «الصواعق» أن الإمام أحمد لما سأله ولده عبد الله عن لعن يزيد قال كيف لا يلعن من لعنه الله تعالى في كتابه؟ فقال عبد الله قد قرأت كتاب الله عز وجل فلم أجد فيه لعن يزيد فقال الإمام إن الله تعالى يقول:
{ فَهَلْ عَسَيْتُمْ إِن تَوَلَّيْتُمْ أَن تُفْسِدُواْ فِي ٱلأَرْضِ وَتُقَطّعُواْ أَرْحَامَكُمْ * أَوْلَـئِكَ ٱلَّذِينَ لَعَنَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ }
[محمد: 22] الآية وأي فساد وقطيعة أشد مما فعله يزيد؟
Translation:The Proof of sending Lanah upon Yazid is derived from this (ayah), as was mentioned by Al-Barzanji (rah) in his Al-Ashaat and Imam al-Haythami (rah) in As-Sawaiq from Imam Ahmed (rah) that his son Abdullah asked him about sending Lanah on Yazid, (Imam Ahmed) said: Why cannot Lanah be sent on him when Allah has sent Lanah on him in Quran, Abdullah (rah) asked: Recite the Kitab of Allah so that I know how Lanah is sent on Yazid? Imam Ahmed (rah) mentioned these verses: Would ye then, if ye were given the command, work corruption in the land and sever your ties of kinship? Such are the men whom Allah has cursed…(47:22-23) Hence what could be a bigger Strife than what Yazid did?[ [Ruh ul Ma’ani by Imam Al-Alusi, Volume 9 Under Surah Muhammad 22-23]
2) Allama Alusi said: And I say what is prevalent over my mind that (Yazid) Khabith did not testify to the messengership of the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). According to me it is correct to curse a person like Yazid, although one cannot imagine a Fasiq like him and apparently he never repented, the possibility of his repentance is weaker than the possibility of his faith (Iman). Along with Yazid, Ibn Ziyad, Ibn Sa’ad and his group shall also be included. Verily, may Allah’s curse be upon all of them, their friends, their supporters, their group and upon everyone who inclines towards them until Qayamah and until an eye sheds a tear for Abu Abdullah Hussain (ra). [Tafsir Ruh al-Ma'ani, Volume 26, Page No. 73]
Click here for Scanned Page (44)
7. Imam Dhahabi (rah) writes about Yazid
وكان ناصبيا فظا غليظا جلفا يتناول المسكر ويفعل المنكر افتتح دولته بمقتل الشهيد الحسين واختتمها بواقعة الحرة فمقته الناس ولم يبارك في عمره وخرج عليه غير واحد بعد الحسين كأهل المدينة قاموا لله
Translation: He (Yazid) was a disgusting Nasibi (i.e. those who hate Ahlul bayt). He drank and did evil. He started his kingdom with the killing of the Shahid al-Hussain (RA) and ended it with the incident of al-Harra (i.e. besiegement of Madina which also makes him directly liable for Lanah as sahih ahadith prove). Hence the people hated him, he was not blessed in his life, and many took up arms against him after Imam Hussain (RA) such as the people of Madina – they rose for the sake of Allah[As Siyar al Alam an Nabula, Volume No. 4, Page No. 37-38]
2) Imam Dhahabi (rah) writes: I say: ‘When Yazid did to the people of Madina what he did and killed al-Hussain and his brothers and progeny, and Yazid drank alcohol, and performed abominable things, then the people hated him and rose up against him more than once. God didn’t bless his life and Abu Bilal Mirdas bin Adya al-Hanzali rose against him.’ [Tarikh al-Islam: wa-tabaqat al-mashahir wa-al-a`lam, Volume 005, Page No. 30]
Click here for Scanned Page (45)
3) Imam Dhahabi Writes: Ziyad Haarthi narrated: ‘Yazid gave me alcohol to drink, I had never drunk alcohol like that before and I enquired where he had obtained its ingredients from’. Yazid replied: ‘it is made of sweet pomegranate, Isfahan’s honey, Hawaz’s sugar, Taif’s grapes and Burdah’s water’. Ahmed bin Masama’ narrated: ‘Once Yazid drank alcohol and started to dance, suddenly he fell down and his nostril began to bleed’. [Siyar al A'lam wa al Nubalah, Volume 004, Page No. 037]
Click here for Scanned Page (47)
8. Qadhi ThanaUllah Panipati (rah) on Yazid
Another great Mufasir and author of great books, a scholar accepted by all Sunni Muslims i.e. Qadhi Thana Ullah Panipatti (rah) quoted Quranic ayah 14:28 and writes:
Quran states: Hast thou not seen those who gave the grace of Allah in exchange for thanklessness and led their people down to the Abode of Loss (14:28)
Tafsir: Bani Ummaiya had always rejoiced upon Kufr, however Abu Sufyan, Ameer Mu’awiya (RA) and Umaro bin Aas(RA) and others became Muslims. Later Yazid and his companions rejected the blessings of Allah and rose the flag of enmity towards Ahlul Bayt and finally brutally martyred Imam Hussain (RA) to the extent that Yazid even denied the Deen of Muhammad (salallaho alaihi wasalam). He after martyrdom of Imam Hussain(RA) said: Had my predecessors lived they would have seen how I took revenge from the family of Prophet (saw) and Bani Hashim, The couplet which Yazid made had this in the end: I will avenge Ahmed (i.e. Prophet Salallaho alaihi wasalam) for whatever he did with my predecessors in Badr (Naudhobillah). Yazid even declared alcohol as permissible and in praise of it he said: If liquor is Haram in the Deen of Muhammad (salallaho alaihi wasalam) then take it to be permissible according to the deen of Isa Ibn Marym (a.s). [Tafsir al Mazhari Volume 5, Pages 211-212]
9. Ibn Kathir’s comments on Yazeed
Ibn Kathir himself writes in al Bidayah Volume 8 page 1169 “Dhikr Yazeed bin Muawiyah”:
“Traditions inform us that Yazeed loved worldly vices, would drink, listen to music, kept the company of boys with no facial hair [civil expression for paedophilia with boys, a form of homosexuality], played drums, kept dogs [civil expression for bestiality], making frogs, bears and monkeys fight. Every morning he used be intoxicated and use to bind monkey with the saddle of a horse and make the horse run”.
Reference:Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Vol 8 Page 1169
10. Ibn Atheer’s comments on Yazeed
In Tareekh al Kamil Volume 3 page 450 Ibn Atheer narrates from Munzir bin Zabeer:
“Verily Yazeed rewarded me with 100,000 dirhams but this cannot stop me from highlighting his state, By Allah he is a drunkard”
11. Ibn Jauzi’s comments on Yazeed ‘the drunkard’
Ibn Jauzi in Wafa al-Wafa:
“Yazeed appointed his cousin Uthman bin Muhammad bin Abu Sufyan as Governor of Madina. He sent a delegation to visit Yazeed who bore gifts so that they might take the oath of allegiance to him. Upon their return they said ‘We have returned having visited a man who has no religion, he drinks, plays instruments, keeps the company of singers and dogs [civil word for bestiality], we declare that we have broken our allegiance to him. Abdullah bin Abi Umro bin Hafs Mukhzumee commented ‘Yazeed gave me gifts. But the reality is this man is an enemy of Allah (swt) and a drunkard. I shall separate myself from him in the same way that I remove my turban [from my head].”
12. Punturing the devil’s dream on Hadith of Qustuntunia
..”He heard the Prophet saying, ‘Paradise is granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition.’ The Prophet then said, ‘The first army amongst my followers who will invade Caesar’s City will be forgiven their sins.’” (Sahih Bukhari volume 4 hadith 175)
Firstly Yazid was not in the first army to wage war on ceaser’s city as
Sahih hadith in Sunnan Abu Dawud states
عن أسلم أبي عمران قال : غزونا من المدينة نريد القسطنطينية وعلى الجماعة عبد الرحمن بن خالد بن الوليد
Translation: Aslam Abi Imran (ra) said: We went out on an expedition from Madina with the intent to attack Constantinople. Abd al-Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid was the leader of our group. [Sunnan Abu Dawud, Volume No. 2 Hadith # 2512, Albani declared it Sahih in his Takhrij]
Imam At-Tabri says in his Tarikh
فمما كان فيها من ذلك دخول المسلمين مع عبد الرحمن بن خالد بن الوليد بلاد الروم ومشتاهم بها وغزو
Translation: In (44 AH) The Muslims with Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid entered Rome and the Ghazwa took place [Tarikh at-Tabri under events of 44 AH, Volume 005, Page No. 212: Published by Cairo: Dar al-Ma'arif] Click here for Scanned Page (83)
Whereas Yazid went way later i.e. in 49 or 50 AH. Even later yazid was sent as a punishement and he mocked at Muslims warriors who had gone before
Imam Ibn Al-Atheer (rah) writes:
في هذه السنة وقيل : سنة خمسين سير معاوية جيشًا كثيفًا إلى بلاد الروم للغزاة ، وجعل عليهم سفيان بن عوف ، وأَمَرَ ابنه يزيد بالغزاة معهم فتثاقل واعتلّ فأمسك عنه أبوه ، فأصاب الناس في غزاتهم جوعٌ ومرض شديد ، فأنشأ يزيد يقول :
ما إن أبالي بما لاقت جموعهم *** بالفرقدونة من حمى ومن موم
إذا اتكأت على الأنماط مرتفقًا *** بدير مروان عندي أم كلثومِ
فبلغ معاوية شعره، فأقسم عليه ليلحقنّ بسفيان في أرض الروم، ليصيبه ما أصاب الناس، فسار ومعه جمع كثير أضافهم إليه أبوه
Translation: In this year i.e. 49 AH or 50 AH, Muawiya (ra) sent a huge army towards Rome. He made Sufyan bin Awf (ra) as its commander and he ordered his son Yazid to go with them, however Yazid “ACTED TO HAVE BECOME SICK AND DENIED TO GO” When the warriors were struck with harsh hunger and diseases, Yazid (mockingly) said this poetry:
At Farqudwana immense wrath covered them, whether they had fever or whatever I don’t care because I am sitting on a high carpet and Umm ul Kulthum (one of his wives) is between my armpits.
When Ameer Muawiya (ra) heard these phrases he made Yazid to take an oath and join Sufyan bin Awf in Rome so that “HE COULD ALSO BE STRUCK BY THESE SAME DIFFICULTIES AS THE WARRIORS OF ISLAM HAD FACED (THIS WAS PUNISHEMENT TO YAZID)” Yazid became helpless and he had to go and Ameer Muawiya (ra) sent another army with him [Tarikh Ibn al Atheer, Volume No.3, Page No. 131]
Imam Badr ud-din Ayni (rah) said:
قلت: الأظهر أن هؤلاء السادات من الصحابة كانوا مع سفيان هذا ولم يكونوا مع يزيد بن معاوية، لأنه لم يكن أهلاً أن يكون هؤلاء السادات في خدمته
Translation: I say that it is obvious that the great amount of sahaba went under the leadership of Sufyan bin Awf (ra) and “NOT WITH YAZID BIN MUAWIYA BECAUSE HE WAS NOT DESERVING OF LEADING THEM” [Umdat ul Qari, Sharh Sahih ul Bukhari 14/197-198]
Summary details about the armed expeditions:
► First attack on Caesar’s city was in 42 hijri. Second attack was in 43 and “Hazrat Bosr ben ABI Arka was the leader of this army.
► Third attack was in 44 and this was led by Abdurehman ben Khalid ben Waleed. The next attack was in 46 hijri which was led by Maalik ben Abdurehman and Abdurehman ben Khalid ben Waleed.
► In 47, next attack was led by Maalik ben Hobaira and Abdurehman ben Qaiymi. In 49 hijri the rome was attacked for 3 times. andLastly yazid was in attack of 50 hijri.
Hazrat Amir Mawiya (RA) arrested Yazeed and sent him to ceasar because Yazeed was used to make fun of Mujahideen and as a punishment Yazeed was sent there not for Jihad
So Yazeed was in the seven’th attack, not in the first attack and in Bukhari Shareef it is mentioned that ‘The first army amongst’ my followers who will invade Caesar’s City will be forgiven their sins.’
References
Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah Imam Ibne Kathir
History Ibne Khaldon
History Imam Ibne Atheer
13. Yazeed’s rejection of the Qur’an
Refer these sources
1. Al Bidayah wa al Nihayah Volume 8 page 204 Dhikr Ras al Husayn
2. Minhajj al Sunnah Volume 2 page 249 Dkikr Yazeed
3. Sharh Fiqh Akbar page 73 Dhikr Yazeed
4. Sharh Tafseer Mazhari Volume 5 page 21 Surah Ibrahim
5. Shazrah al Dhahab page 69 Dhikr Shahadth Husayn
6. Maqatahil Husayn Volume 2 page 58 Dhikr Shahdath Husayn
7. Tadhkira Khawwas page 148
8. Tareekh Tabari Volume 11 pages 21-23 Dhikr 284 Hijri
9. Tafseer Ruh al Ma’ani (commentary of Surah Muhammad)
14. In Tafseer Ruh al Maani Declairing Yazeed a kafir
“Allamah Alusi stated, Yazeed the impure denied the Prophethood of Rasulullah (s). The treatment that he meted out to the people of Makka, Medina and the family of the Prophet proves that he was a kaafir”.
Once in the gathering of Amir Ul Mominein Hazrat Ummar Bin Abdul Aziz [R.A] people talked about yazeed, someone among the people said ( Amir Ul Mominein to Yazeed ) Hazrat Ummar Bin Abdul Aziz [R.A] replied in anger,” you call Yazeed ( Bad Character Person ) as Amir Ul Mominein?. Than Hazrat Ummar Bin Abdul Aziz [R.A] gave order of 20 lashes to the person who called Yazeed Amir Ul Mominein [ Tahdheeb Al'Tahdheeb Vol 1 Page 361]
15. The Proof of Sending Curses(Lanat) on Yazid!
Translation:The Proof of sending Lanah upon Yazid is derived from this (ayah), as was mentioned by Al-Barzanji (rah) in his Al-Ashaat and Imam Haythami (rah) in As-Sawaiq from Imam Ahmed (rah) that his son Abdullah asked him about sending Lanah on Yazid, and how sending Lanah upon him is mentioned in the book of Allah (i.e. Quran). Imam Ahmed (rah) in proof of (sending Lanah upon Yazid) mentioned these verses:Would ye then, if ye were given the command, work corruption in the land and sever your ties of kinship? Such are the men whom Allah has cursed…(47:22-23), So could there be a greater fitnah than the actions committed by Yazid? [Ruh ul Ma’ani by Imam Al-Alusi, Volume 9 Under Surah Muhammad 22-23]
Visit for more info , JazakAllah khair !!!!!
http://www.ahlus-sunna.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=65&Itemid=130
Kindly change my nick “Nomi Deobandi Salafi” to “Nomi”
thanks
i don’t get if we muslims are towards the solution of problems or creating new problems. iqbal said,’ FIRQA BANDI HE KAHIN AUR KAHIN ZAATEN HAIN!
KYA ZIMANE ME PANAPNE KI YEHI BATE HAIN?’
In ki shakloon say hi Allah ki lanat ka andaza ho jata hai jo dushman-e-ahlulbayt hai un sab per lanat bahshumar… Yazeed ibe mavia per Lanat bahshumar aur us ki all olad per lanat bahshumar.. Yazeed lanati tayri jud pay lanat bahshumarrrrrrrrrrrr
Just look at their faces. These Khabis and Lanti are not looking like Muslims. Can any sane Muslim support a rapist, a killer, a drunkard and an illegitimate child as a faithful caliph of the Muslims when top class followers were present. Just show me any beautiful face among them and I shall accept their logic.
Shakal ki nahi akeedy ki baat hoti hy.
lagta ha yazeed aur muwaih tera bhi baap tha ………………………………….
yazeEd ibn e muavia was a worSt traitor of Islam. i cn undrStant tht people who r bcking yazeEd are aCtUalLy enemies of ahl e bait.
or Mola Ali or amer muaviyah k darmiyan na koi gHalat fEhmi thi or na he sulah hui thi. khilafat k khilaf bagHavat aik naQabil e muafi jurm hy.
Rasool AlLah s.a.w.w ka farman e aali shan hy k jis ne Ali se muhaBt ki us ne mjhse muhaBt ki to goya us ne AlLah se muhaBt ki or jis ne Ali se bugHz rakha us ne mjhse bugHz rakha to gya us ne AlLah se bugHz rakha.
after reading this farman where did amer muavia stands? where did yazeEd stands?
baat yeh hai k yeh log to apni zindagi guzzar gye unhn ne jo amal kye un ko us ka swab millay ga baat ati hai hmary amalki hm kya kr rhe hain lraiyan apny zati mfad k lye k kaheen me chota na pr jaon is se apni anna k lye lar rhe hain ek kehta hai me sahi hn r k kehta hai me to chese kya halan k apna pta nai khud kya hain ek dsray pr lannat bhejty bhejty Allah ki laant na pr jaey ek oper b betha js ny hissab leena hai yeh dunya uski hai hm u k bndy hain seedhi baat jo Allah k bndON se pyar krtra hai Allah us se pyar krta hai to hmie us se pyar krna chahye js se Allah pyar krta hai r wo hain hmare pyare Rasool(SAW)R UNKI AHL-E-BAIT r HAzrat imam HAssan (R.A)R SAHABA(R.A)
r rahi baat yazzid ki pta nai baqi sare isses chaor kr yazzid ko defend kun krty ho us ny kya tm loon ko roze mehshar bchana hai ya us se pati dali hui hai ya us se rishwat li hai usko to defend aise kr rh ehain jesse us ki baqyat reh gyi hain islam seedhi baat kehta hai r muhhbat ka deen hai agar kuch nai kr skty to istrhan k ftway r articles mat likho r yeh scholors uffffffffffffffffffffff ALLAH bchaey aise fitnoooooooooo se WE LOVE PROPHET(PBUH) EHL-E-BAIT SAHABA (R.A)
Hey Nomi,
Well done on the research, very well done.
You are truely very educated and hopefully have opened the eyes of so many deobandi’s. Also Muawiyah Jhangvi Deobandi PLEASE NOTE, you speak of protecting Ahle-bayth ??? Who is in the AHLE Bayth if not The [prophets, daughter his cousin/son in law and his Grandchildren. Fear the fire of hell my friend….and fear the Prophet on the last day when he will ask you ‘You praised the murderer of my most beloved’ ? what will be your answer my friend ?
Im not saying that Shia’s are 100% correct or moderate sunni’s are correct…but at least they remember the Prophet and his family rather than say his name in prayer as a formality
What i understand from all this : IT WAS A POLITICAL MATTER NOT A RELIGIOUS ONE. OUR BELOVED PROPHET MUHAMMAD PBUH TREATED EVERYONE EQUALLY AND HIS MESSAGE IS FOR EVERYONE. ISLAM IS A TRUE RELIGION N WHO BELIEVES IS A MUSLIM NOTHING ELSE (MEANS NO SECT). IF YOU CALL YOURSELF ANYTHING BUT MUSLIM THEN YOU ARE ACTING AGAINST QURAN. IT IS WRITTEN IN QURAN FOLLOW ALLAH SWT AND MUHAMMAD PBUH. AFTER THE DEATH OF PROPHET ANYTHING ADDED IN ISLAM IS BIDHA OR SHIRK.WHAT ALLAH SWT WANTS FROM US IS TO OBEY N ACT ACCORDING TO QURAN AND DONT GET STUCK IN THIS SO CALLED ISLAMIC HISTORY WHICH IS WRITTEN MANY HUNDREDS YEARS AFTER THE ACTUAL INCIDENTS. A TRUE MUSLIM CAN NEVER SAY BAD WORDS EVEN FOR HIS WORST ENEMY, HE CAN NOT SAY ANYTHING BUT YA ALLAH MADAD , HE ONLY ASK HELP FROM ALLAH SWT, JUST PRAY DAY N NIGHT FOR ONLY ONE ALLAH SWT, ASK FOR THE RIGHT PATH , ACT LIKE MUHAMMAD PBUH. HE JUST DONT REMEMBER THE NAMES OF THE PROPHET N HIS FAMILY BUT ACT WHAT HE PREACHES. MAY ALLAH SWT GUIDE US ALL TO THE RIGHT PATH. AMEEN
According to Hazral Zainul Abideen. R.a
His father Hazrat Hussain. R:a was killed by shai’ of kuffa ..
You shai not not following ur own imams.
Read ur books properly.. Then curse any Suhaba of MUHAMMAD [S A W].
oye dangro ki oulado yazeedi kutto… MUjay yeh btao k KAABAY PAY SANGBAARI KIS NAY KARWAI? MASJID E NABVI S.A.W.W MAIN GHORAY OR KHACHAR KIS NAY BANDAY? AYAAM E HURRA(wo 3 din jab madinay ki galio main azan na hovi or qatal o gharat hovi) Hazrat Abdulah ibn e Zubair ko kis nay Shaheed kar waya???????????? is k bawajood b tum Yazeed ko Jannat main GHASEET RAY ho to Ao 1 dua karain k ALLAH tumy QAYYAMAT mai YAZEED LANTI MALOON K 7 UTHAY OR HUMAY IMAM E AZAM SHEZADA E RASOOL OULAD E RASOOL TAMAM JANATI NOUJAWAON K SARDAR IMAM E AALI MAQAM SYEDNA IMAM E HUSSAIN ALE HE SALAM WA RAZI ALLAH HO ANHO K 7 UTHAY AMEEN
lakhon lanat muwaih aur yazeed per aur unke aulaad per …………..kisi ko kuch bhi kahna ha tu in kutao sorry kuta tu wafadar hota ha in pigs ke shakal walaon ke baray me tu likhe ya ya kehay na belka kar ke dekhay.muwaaaih teri jad pe aur aal pe lanat ,lanat .lanat beshumaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar